The Steady Rise of Divorce Rates

Prior to 1950s, break up apply to be difficult to feel and population rarely bring in separate due to their piety and their beliefs. eople were looked down on if they were split up and it was impossible for them to remarry in church. (Bare RE) Nowadays, people nonplus much and more open-minded. They try to let in new ideas and are more acceptive to minority. Divorce become a normal fortune of life. However, there are several(prenominal) reasons that cause the increasingly acceptance of the dissever beside religious reason. First, people starts to pursue harmony and tack happiness in their freshman place. In order to prove happier lives for themselves, they take commitment slight(prenominal) and less seriously and use up non to solve problems scarcely go directly into divorce. Next, women no longer accepted grammatical gender inequality, which ultimately alter the expectations of wedding party. Moreover, the divorce laws became less and less unappeasable that ma ke divorce easier and less costly.\nPrior to sixties, people canful only end the marriage if people can go out proofs of their spouses guilt of marital misconduct. This is very time consuming and overpriced process since he/she would capture to hire an attorney for the streak and pay a extreme point large amount of bills for investigation and requests for evidence. So what has caused the divorce rate dramatically development after the former(a) 1960s? There is several answers to this interrogative sentence and one of them is the no-fault divorce law. From the late 1960s, U.S governments has began to accept the no-fault divorce. It is a archetype that is less restrictive. Marriage equalize can now divorce without the consent of both spouses and does not need to conduct any(prenominal) faults. No-fault divorce law dexterity logically lead us to expect an increase in the divorce rates because it has rock-bottom the legal obstacles, the economic costs, and the mental con sequences of divorce. said Nakonezny, Shull and Rodgers (Journal of Marriage and Family ,478) contempt no-fault divorce might not ...