'M.L.K and Malcolm X Compare/Contrast\r'

'The twain most influential civil pay offs activists in the Statesn history were Dr. Martin Luther great power jr. and Malcolm X. They supported equal rights for e really race, hardly when comparing MLK’s â€Å"I afford a imagine’ and Malcolm X’s â€Å"The suffrage or the Bullet,” one sees the similarities in their rhetorical styles and differences in their tone and message. As seen in â€Å"I buzz off a Dream,” MLK has a more fine-tune and calm solution to the state’s hassles; whereas in X’s he has a impart to do whatever it washcloththorn discern to solve the problems. Martin Luther nance junior nd Malcolm X manipulation the similar rhetorical strategies to enhance their message in their lecturinges. One ruse or system is repetition. In world-beater’s speech he repeated the phrase â€Å"I have a dream’ in order to emphasize to his audience the vastness on their cause and to stimulate the mess ’s pride furthering civil rights. King cute everyone to see America’s true potential and beauty and how America could be. Malcolm X also demonstrated the use of repetition when he repeats â€Å"I’m not here. ” He illustrates to his audience that he is not there to talk approximately himself, just of the greater cause, in otherwise speech, the fight for civil rights.\r\nThough twain whitethorn have apply the very(prenominal) devices and advocated the same goal, both had opposite solutions to the nation’s problem. Another shared woodland in their works is the use of antithesis. In Dr. King’s â€Å"I Have a Dream”, he states â€Å" straight off is the time to lift our nation from the apace sands of racial in arbiter to the hard rock of brotherhood. ” He depicts that the nation should dismiss all discrimination and come together as one and become a unit of one another harmonizing. X also had great use of this device to amplify compassion for his cause.\r\nAn excellent suit is the phrase and title, â€Å"The ballot or the bullet. ” He resembling King wanted to decease all the racial barriers that the nation had, but instead of encouraging the act of nonviolent resistance he told the â€Å"negro” community that they every take â€Å"the ballot” signifying that they wouldn’t do eachthing or â€Å"the bullet” that symbolizes and provokes the deprivation to take action into their own hands and fight. some(prenominal) King and X used the same methods to captivate their audiences towards their view, though communicated differentiate messages.\r\nKing and X employed figurative style in their methods of persuading their audience. In King’s â€Å"I Have a Dream” speech he conveys the use of similes in the phrase, â€Å"We will not be commodious until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a justly stream,” in order to ill ustrate the need for justice until all are equal. He stresses the need of discrimination to end and for justice to let all nondiscriminatory in society. He used the negativity of injustice and morose it into a positive of justice existence endless water that roars through a mighty stream that will eternally be flowing.\r\nX also used similes to describe that all â€Å"negroes” are in the same boat and all will get the same treatment from the white man in the phrase, â€Å"…you’re way out to catch hell just like I am. ” He emphasizes that all â€Å"negroes” whether meliorate or illiterate or wealthy or poor will realize the same result of the hell that is creation brought upon the by the same man who happens to be white. Both Martin Luther King and Malcolm X entangle the lack of acceptance and the treachery being brought upon them by the white man in their use of similes.\r\nAlthough Martin Luther King and Malcolm X may have used the same rh etorical devices to persuade the same general audience, both broadcasted entirely different messages, with entirely different tones, on what should be done on their problems. King concentrated on a more pacifist approach in his speech with the use of such lecture as dream, happy, greatest, and freedom. His message was to thwart racialism with as much nobility as possible, so that when viewed upon you’d be the lilting in the darkest of rooms.\r\nHe wanted battalion to not give up on their dreams and not lose their self mince of military personnel even though they were try to abolish such wrongdoing that was very inhumane. On the other hand, Malcolm X couldn’t have had a more contrasting message and tone in his â€Å"the Ballot or the Bullet” speech. He chose words like hell, suffered, degrading, treachery and false promises to grain the vengeance in the minds of his audience and for them to recall the will to fight for freedom. He wanted to create total c haos and pervert in the souls and mind of his listeners to ensure the speedy way possible for them to hear the ticker of his motives.\r\nHe had no intentions in believe that racism would subside or that any of the white men would see the misplay in their ways and beg for their mercy and to live in complete harmony. He thought that the only way for the fatal community to really get what they merit is to use the bullet and fight. King had a solution to end the nationwide problem with a more passive and civilized solution, the brought out the goodness in humanity because â€Å"an eye for an eye will grant the world blind”; whereas X wanted the use of forces on the enemy no matter how much damaged caused in order for them to give equal rights to all.\r\nMartin Luther King and Malcolm X definitely had the same breathing in to end segregation and discrimination, but the head teacher as to whose message was more trenchant and which was a right way to reference work the ca use is still challengeable. King sought-after(a) to spread pacifism and tolerance- the moral right that you should always live by; whereas Malcolm X sought the need of destructiveness in a highly troublesome situation. One must look at the outcome and the latest civil rights situations to find an answer to that question to see that without both types of arguments there would be no balance. For every light there is a cast of shadows that follow it.\r\n'