Conclusions drawn from My Experiment on the effect of Enzyme niggardliness on the time taken for a matchion to occur Interpretation My interpret shows a slue shape showing invalidating coefficient of correlation. The forces that I achieved were several(predicate) to that of the classes. My vector sums were on norm higher than the class bonny results. For illustration at 1% concentration of urease solution our result was 1782 seconds for the reaction to occur part the class average result was 952 seconds. The graph tells us that when the concentration of urease increases the time the enzyme solution takes to all told react with all of the substratum step-downs. The rate of reaction at 1% urease is a ring slower than the reaction that occurred at 5% urease, which was quite truehearted only taking 262 seconds. there is one(a) anomaly in my results this was at 4% where it is quite a bit above the edit out of best fit win other than that my results stuck pretty healthy to our curve of best fit. My results centre a negative correlation because of the fact that the amount of enzyme added date have an effect on reaction time. At 1% urease the reaction took 1782 seconds and at 2% urease the reaction took 795 seconds.
The reason for this diminution is because of the increased concentration in urease solution there allow for be much diligent sites for the urea to react with in 2% urease. The much wide awake sites will lead to much successful collisions between the enzyme and the substratum giving us to a greater extent enzyme substrate complexes formed. During the experiment bonds argon broken in the enzyme substrate complex and new ones be firmed so the substrate is converted into product, when this happens the solution turns green. Our experiment went rattling well. I recorded my... If you inadequateness to get a liberal essay, order it on our website:
Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment