Is Man Naturally Good or Evil? Philosophy of Man University of Santo Tomas Essay

I. Summary All work force be equal by nature, argon we not? We on the whole have the same faculties, all needing the same provisions. From this equating and needs comes the survival of the fittest. One could go to any length entirely to attain his ends, ends such as dominion over the majority. Now, dominance wad besides exist if there are multitude you digest master on. If one feels that his companion is a threat, there is a possibility of him subduing this companion, or maybe looking for some other company he could dominate over.The world of these competitions could be attributed to the principle that man is inherently deplorable. With these competitions, comes diffidence and glory. Man is unendingly in pursuit of these three, whether we are aware of it or not. Man exists in the external world as a reactive creature that senses objects and is operate to act by the constant motions of the world. These constant motions lead to mans constant and insatiable desires and wan ts, which in a state of nature pits everyone against another in a perpetual state of war.Here men are equal in that anyone can kill anyone else, and as such men get laid in a constant state of fear and anxiety. earthly concern live to survive. This goes way digest to our very beginnings as cave people who, would hunt and do anything to live and keep on living. Now, living consists of more than than just eating and not being killed. There are ones that live in the lap of luxury, and ones that live with much lower standards. As so, selfishness to a fault has different levels depending upon lifestyle and what makes you live.So, technically, selfishness is something that we as humans are innate(p) with, but its perceived differently usually depending upon how the person was brought up as a child or has learned over time. However, overtime, it can be proven that everything we do will always lead back to one point We do it for ourselves. Man is basically nice since it is a fact that man is a social animal whose existence depends on the continued physical and spiritual relations between human beings, these relations must be based either on affinity, solidarity and love, or on hostility and contend.If each individual thinks hardly of his well-being, or perhaps that of his midget consanguinity or territorial group, he will obviously scram himself in conflict with others, and will emerge as victor or vanquished as the oppressor if he wins, as the oppressed if he loses. Natural harmony, the raw(a) marriage of the high-priced of each with that of all, is the invention of human laziness, which rather than struggle to achieve what it wants assumes that it will be achieved spontaneously, by indispensable law.In reality, however, natural Man is in a state of continuous conflict with his fellows in his quest for the best, and healthiest site, the most fertile land, and in time, to exploit the many and vary opportunities that social life creates for some or for oth ers. For this reason human recital is full of violence, wars, carnage (besides the ruthless exploitation of the labour of others) and innumerable tyrannies and slavery.If in the human essence there had only existed this punitive instinct of lacking(p) to prevail and to profit at the expense of others, humanity would have remained in its barbaric state and the development of order as recorded in antiquity, or in our own times, would not have been possible. This order steady at its nastiest, always signifies a kind of mitigating of the despotic spirit with a minimum of social solidarity, indispensable for a more civilised life. exactly fortuitously there exists in man another feeling which lures him adjacent to his neighbour, the feeling of sympathy, of love, and, thanks to it, mankind became more civilised, and from it grew our idea which aims at qualification high society a true gathering, all working for the common good. reception The topic of human nature has been debated o ver for years, maybe even centuries.Who wouldnt be tempted to wonder about the logic of human behaviour? Nonetheless, the larger question is Is the answer a sheer good or evil? If your answer to that is a yes, then I beg to disagree. Experiences have pushed me to the endpoint that there is no such thing as good or evil. This notion is a meagre attempt to the conception of the underpinning of an organization. We are all different we would cease to exist otherwise. People have respective(a) everything perspectives, habits, feelings, senses, and methods. matinee idol made us so. Each of us has functions vital to each society we belong in.The loss of one function would create a ruffle up effect that would spread all over the society that could bring it to its demise. . The good and evil that you see dont even exist in reality, at least outside of the mind that believes in them. They are only judgments passed by the individual from their own unique perspective. What one person sees as bad or evil may seem to be the only logical thing to do from some other perspective. The ideas of both good and evil are point of view specific.To sum it all up good is the name we give to people who do things that we think we like. sinfulness is the name we give to people who do the things that we dont like. This is of dustup based solely on our particular point of view. This Good and repulsiveness concept DOES NOT EXIST. It is merely an illusion. What people have is what we should call diverse perceptions. I dont think we have to the right to justice a person evil especially if we do not hump their story. After all, we are mere human beings giving our best dead reckoning at survival.