Legalizing Drugs Essay -- Illegal Drugs Narcotics

Legalizing medicates drug legitimation is an enduring question that presently faces our scholars. This subject embraces two positions drugs should no be legalized and drugs should be legalized. These two positions contain an drift of angles that supports each issue. This brief of the issues enables one to consider the strengths and weakness of each dividing line, bring to pass aware of the grounds of disagreement and agreement and ultimately form an eyeshot based upon the positions stated within the articles. In the article Against the Legalization of Drugs, by James Q. Wilson, the current status of drugs is supported. Wilson believes if a drug such as heroin were legalized there would be no financial or aesculapian reason to avoid heroin usage therefore, anybody could afford it (367). Wilson stated that during 1960s, British physicians were allowed to prescribe heroin to addicts until the number of addicts increased fivefold. He argued that cocaine is non a victimless h orror. Addicts victimize children by neglect and spouses by not providing (370). Wilson upholds that illegality of drugs increases crime because users need to pay for their habit (372). He believes the benefit of illegal drugs is it forces patients who memorialize under legal compulsion to complete their treatment due to the jam and drug-education programs in the schools (374). Wilson is convinced the difference between nicotine and cocaine is that while tobacco plant shortens ones life, cocaine debase it and destroys the addicts humanity (375). Wilsons argument is strong because he demonstrates his knowledge of the subject and supports it with many clear, scientific facts and historic examples of drug usage. He interprets facts differently by seeing logical false belief and factual error (371) in what other perceive as cosmos a true. He also acknowledges his opposition by addressing how the advocates of legalization react to his position. Wilson recognizes that that he may be wrong about his conclusions of drug legalization. up to now he states if he is wrong, money will be saved, while if he is right, and the legalizers prevail, then millions of people, thousands of infants and hundreds of neighborhoods will live a life of disease (377-8). In the article Drug Policy and the Intellectuals, by William J. Bennentt, drug legalization was not supported. Bennett wants to address the root causes of drugs by means of... ...ons of this issue provide were in full supported. I concluded that the anti-legalist hold a stronger argument than the legalist. Still, Drug legalization is an enduring question that presently faces our scholars. Works Cited Bennett, William J. Drug Policy and the Intellectuals. Drug Policy 1989-90, A Guide. Ed. Arnold S Trebach and Kevin B. Zeese. Rpt. In Current Issues and Enduring Questions. Ed. untaught Barnet and Hugo Bedau. Boston Bedford/St. Martins, 1996. 358-64. Schmoke, Kurt, A War for the Surgeon General, Not the Attorney Gener al. impertinently Perspectives. Rpt. in Current Issues and Enduring Questions. Ed. Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau. Boston Bedford/St. Martins, 1996. 379-84. Tooley Michael, Our Current Drug Legalization Grounds for Reconsideration, Newsletter of the Center for Values and Social Policy, vol8, no. 1, Spring 1994. Rpt.in Current Issues and Enduring Questions. Ed. Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau. Boston Bedford/St. Martins, 1996. 385-89. Wilson, James Q, Against the legalization of Drugs, Commentary, Feburary 1990. Rpt.in Current Issues and Enduring Questions. Ed. Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau. Boston Bedford/St. Martins, 1996. 365-78.